A bi-weekly challenge from Andre Mirabelli & Opturo

If you use “Purchases in the Basis Dietz”, how do you approach the following scenario?
The cash in a portfolio starts the day with a small gain and then the portfolio uses all of the starting cash and half of that small cash gain (“sells cash”) to purchase a non-cash instrument. Thus, nothing ever goes short.


If, as many suggest, one uses a “purchases at open and sales at close” Dietz calculation for the trade-inclusive return of a component of a portfolio on a single day, in order to keep non-cash returns reasonable in the presence of large sales, how should one calculate the weight and return of cash so that weights still sum to one and the returns of all holdings roll up appropriately to the portfolio return, without having an actual gain in cash being described by an unreasonably large negative cash return? To avoid this problem, would it be OK if the returns of un-traded holdings change just because other items in the portfolio are traded?

A bi-weekly challenge from Andre Mirabelli & Opturo

Related news

Reliably Actionable Investment Analysis Of Yourself

Opturo provides the best of breed analysis of the impact of each of the actual decisions that created investment results.
Read more

Opturo’s Proprietary IRR Engine Excel Examples

Download the Excel spreadsheet that illustrates the issues with Excel's XIRR.
Read more

Multi-Period Decision Attribution

Brinson Attribution was originally conceived as a single-period evaluation of the impact of sector effects vs. issue effects. Its development has moved along two dimensions. The first is its expansion to include multiperiod evaluations. The second is toward a clearer understanding of its purpose as an evaluation of controllable investment decisions.
Read more